RAG · AI ASSISTANTS

RAG and AI assistant development

We build assistants that work with your documents, knowledge bases, and business systems. The scope goes beyond a chat UI: access control, ingestion, updates, retrieval, cited answers, evaluation, observability, and integrations all matter.

DISCOVERY → DELIVERY → MEASUREMENT

01 · DIRECT ANSWER

Where to start

RAG fits when answers must rely on a governed corpus and expose evidence. Quality depends on access controls, data freshness, retrieval and answer evaluation, abstention when evidence is insufficient, and human escalation—not only the model.

02 · FIT

When this approach fits

Governed knowledge

Sources, owners, access policy, and update cycles are known.

Evidence-linked answer

The user needs the document and passage supporting a conclusion.

03 · INPUTS AND OUTPUTS

Stage deliverables

Inputs for discovery

  • Corpus and owners
  • Roles and access controls
  • Evaluation questions and expected sources
  • Abstention and escalation policy
  1. 01

    Discovery

    Workflow, data, risk, baseline, and explicit pilot decision criteria.

  2. 02

    Pilot

    One end-to-end flow, a versioned evaluation set, error log, and comparable measurement.

  3. 03

    Production

    Roles, access, monitoring, versions, incident procedures, and a validated operating boundary.

04 · SYSTEM

Architecture and integrations

01

Retrieval

Ingestion, chunks, index, access filters, retrieval, and reranking are evaluated separately.

02

Answering

Context, citations, faithfulness, abstention, and instruction injection controls form one system.

05 · DECISION

Continue or stop gates

DecisionCondition
ContinueValue and quality are supported by comparable evidence, while residual risk and TCO are acceptable to the workflow owner.
Narrow the scopeValue exists, but some actions, sources, or error classes require a smaller AI role.
StopData is unavailable, the result cannot be observed, deterministic automation is better, or residual error cost is unacceptable.

How the result is measured

Quality
A versioned set of real scenarios, error types and severity, abstention, and manual corrections.
System behaviour
Latency, availability, cost per workflow, integration failures, and drift after changes.
Business workflow
Comparison with the baseline: cycle time, manual touches, throughput, or another preselected measure.

Operations and total cost

Observability
Logs that minimise sensitive data, decision traces, alerts, and incident review.
Change control
Data, model, prompt, and integration versions pass the evaluation set and have a rollback path.
TCO
Discovery, integrations, model calls, infrastructure, monitoring, human review, and support all count.

Risks and limitations

Data and rights
Data scope, processing basis, provenance, storage, and access are established before a pilot.
Rare high-cost errors
Average quality does not hide critical classes; those use constraints, abstention, or human decision.
Dependencies
External models and APIs can change price, limits, and behaviour; material dependencies need fallback or replacement.

07 · FAQ

RAG and AI assistant FAQ

Does RAG eliminate hallucinations?

No. RAG can improve grounding, but errors remain possible. Test sets, citations, narrow scope, and human review are needed for critical decisions.

Can document permissions be preserved?

Yes. Access rules must be enforced during retrieval so users receive context only from sources they are authorised to view.

Can it use PDFs, a Wiki, CRM, and databases?

Often yes, but each source needs separate validation. Structure, extraction quality, freshness, permissions, and update mechanisms affect the result.

Can the system run in a private environment?

It depends on the infrastructure and model choice. We evaluate APIs and open-source options against data, cost, and quality requirements.

START A PROJECT

Test an assistant on your data

Share sample sources and 10–20 real questions. That creates a practical basis for technical diagnosis and evaluation.